Cannabis: In Focus

  • Two Bipartisan Bills Introduced to Regulate CBD
  • Congressional Letter Circulated Regarding Biden Administration’s Cannabis Scheduling Review
  • Alcohol Industry Group Issues Open Letter Supporting Cannabis Legalization
  • SEC Charges Cannabis Company With Securities Fraud


Continue Reading Cannabis Legal Report—Week of March 27, 2023

Cannabis: In Focus

  • FDA Rejects Citizen Petitions, Declines To Regulate CBD as a Dietary Supplement
  • Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Cannabis Company’s RICO Claims
  • Tenth Circuit Holds that 2018 Farm Bill Doesn’t Create Private Cause of Action for Hemp Farmers
  • US Virgin Islands Legalizes Recreational Cannabis


Continue Reading Cannabis Legal Report—Week of January 30, 2023

Cannabis: In Focus

  • New York City Attempts to Crack Down on Illicit Cannabis Market
  • Connecticut Launches Recreational Cannabis Sales, With More States Expected to Follow in 2023
  • Psilocybin State Updates
  • FDA Issues Three New Warning Letters to CBD Product Manufacturers Alleging COVID-19 Benefits
  • Congressional Research Service: Cannabis Banking and the Federal Reserve


Continue Reading Cannabis Legal Report—Week of January 23, 2023

As 2022 drew to a close, the Wall Street Journal reported that the FDA is finally considering releasing potential guidance regarding cannabidiol (“CBD”) in the coming year. While the exact timeline and scope of the FDA’s potential action is unclear, the Journal asserts that the agency will decide “within months” regarding the appropriate regulation of CBD and whether that regulation would require Congressional action or new agency rulemaking. Concurrently, the FDA continues to explore potential CBD safety risks.

The agency has generally pursued limited enforcement activity to-date regarding CBD, with a focus on products in foods and beverages that make unsubstantiated health claims, such as claims that CBD could treat or prevent cancer or Covid-19. Stopping short of taking aggressive action, the FDA has only issued warning letters on CBD, despite the widespread availability of largely-unregulated food and beverage products containing the hemp-derived cannabinoid.

Continue Reading Will The New Year Finally Bring FDA Guidance on CBD?

On November 16, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued five new warning letters to various companies making edible products containing cannabidiol (CBD) and/or Delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The companies were directed by the FDA to respond within 15 days to defend how their products do not violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and how they plan to bring their products into compliance with the FDCA. Failure to address the issue to the agency’s satisfaction could plausibly result in enforcement actions, including seizure and/or an injunction.

The FDA’s most recent set of warning letters builds upon warning letters sent earlier this year targeting CBD and Delta-8 THC products. Previously, FDA has largely focused on CBD products that made health claims. These new warning letters are not, however, limited to those prior concerns. The FDA now appears to be particularly concerned about CBD and Delta-8 THC products that appeal to children.

Continue Reading FDA Issues New Warning Letters to Companies Making CBD and Delta-8 THC Edibles

Cannabis: In Focus

  • New Mexico class action calls for insurance coverage for medical cannabis
  • Bicameral attempt to legislate bipartisan cannabis omnibus package
  • Oregon ban on “artificially derived cannabinoids” in cannabis products set to take effect July 1, 2022


Continue Reading Cannabis Legal Report—Week of June 19, 2022

As the cannabis industry and its associated sectors have gained increasing social and legal acceptance, these businesses have started to face an issue that has been plaguing traditional Consumer Packaged Goods companies in the state of California for decades—Proposition 65 claims.

Proposition 65 is a California initiative approved by voters in 1986 and enacted into law as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. The law requires California to publish a list of substances that are known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm. The law prohibits “knowingly and intentionally” causing exposure to one of the substances on the list without first providing a “clear and reasonable” warning. To comply with Proposition 65, businesses must provide consumers with a Proposition 65 compliant warning unless they can ensure that their product does not expose consumers to a listed substance at levels that may cause cancer or reproductive harm.

Continue Reading Prop 65 Plaintiffs Set Their Sights on Cannabis Industry

On May 26, the FDA issued warning letters to four companies alleging that the companies sold unapproved animal drugs containing cannabidiol (CBD). Specifically, these products were intended for use in food-producing animals. In announcing the warning letters, the agency stated it was “taking steps regarding these unapproved and potentially unsafe products now to help protect animals and the safety of the food supply.”

The FDA’s latest set of warning letters builds upon the letters the agency has issued in recent years that highlight that CBD products are not approved for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of any disease. Just this year, the agency issued at least 14 such letters targeting consumer products. These warning letters are unique as they target companies selling products targeted for food-producing animals, rather than those focused on human consumption.  

Continue Reading FDA Issues New CBD Warning Letters for Animal Products